<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: President Obama Issues FOIA Memo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.publicrecordsguy.com/president-obama-foia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.publicrecordsguy.com/president-obama-foia/</link>
	<description>Uncovering The Facts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 05:09:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: James F. Grant</title>
		<link>http://www.publicrecordsguy.com/president-obama-foia/comment-page-1/#comment-1274</link>
		<dc:creator>James F. Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 04:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.publicrecordsguy.com/?p=479#comment-1274</guid>
		<description>I think you should read the FAS commentary on what Obama has done, and don&#039;t celebrate too much. His order only applies to &quot;discretionary&quot; material which is a very small portion of gov&#039;t records. Most material that is classified is rendered so by statute, not agency whim. As the FAS blog says:
&quot; Inevitably, several caveats are in order.  A “presumption of disclosure” really only applies to records that are potentially subject to discretionary release, which is a finite subset of secret government information.  Vast realms of information are sequestered behind classification barriers or statutory protections that remain unaffected by the new policy statements.  “In the face of doubt, openness prevails,” the President said.  But throughout the government secrecy system, there is not a lot of doubt or soul-searching about the application of secrecy.&quot;
See: http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you should read the FAS commentary on what Obama has done, and don&#8217;t celebrate too much. His order only applies to &#8220;discretionary&#8221; material which is a very small portion of gov&#8217;t records. Most material that is classified is rendered so by statute, not agency whim. As the FAS blog says:<br />
&#8221; Inevitably, several caveats are in order.  A “presumption of disclosure” really only applies to records that are potentially subject to discretionary release, which is a finite subset of secret government information.  Vast realms of information are sequestered behind classification barriers or statutory protections that remain unaffected by the new policy statements.  “In the face of doubt, openness prevails,” the President said.  But throughout the government secrecy system, there is not a lot of doubt or soul-searching about the application of secrecy.&#8221;<br />
See: <a href="http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/" >http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
